https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300139 Section 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is described as permitting trial of PMLA offences and connected scheduled offences before the Special Court, but not as extending jurisdiction to CBI cases charging only Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act offences. The text states that the existence of a separate PMLA complaint did not by itself justify transfer of those criminal cases to the PMLA Special Court. It also notes that the proceedings had substantially advanced, with some witnesses already examined, so a transfer at that stage would risk prejudice and delay. The transfer request was therefore rejected on the stated jurisdictional and practical grounds. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:36:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300139 Section 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is described as permitting trial of PMLA offences and connected scheduled offences before the Special Court, but not as extending jurisdiction to CBI cases charging only Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act offences. The text states that the existence of a separate PMLA complaint did not by itself justify transfer of those criminal cases to the PMLA Special Court. It also notes that the proceedings had substantially advanced, with some witnesses already examined, so a transfer at that stage would risk prejudice and delay. The transfer request was therefore rejected on the stated jurisdictional and practical grounds. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300139