<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 36 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27711</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction to permit the assessee to raise new grounds not previously raised before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, as long as these grounds relate to the subject matter of the appeal. Referring to relevant Supreme Court decisions, the court emphasized that the Tribunal&#039;s power is broad but must be exercised within the scope of the appeal&#039;s subject matter. In the case at hand, the Tribunal correctly allowed the assessee, a public limited company, to raise an additional ground concerning capital computation for the assessment years in question. The decision favored the assessee over the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 36 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27711</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction to permit the assessee to raise new grounds not previously raised before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, as long as these grounds relate to the subject matter of the appeal. Referring to relevant Supreme Court decisions, the court emphasized that the Tribunal&#039;s power is broad but must be exercised within the scope of the appeal&#039;s subject matter. In the case at hand, the Tribunal correctly allowed the assessee, a public limited company, to raise an additional ground concerning capital computation for the assessment years in question. The decision favored the assessee over the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>