https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300151 The Supreme Court held that the complaint against the appellant under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not maintainable as the company was not arraigned as an accused. The Court acquitted the appellant, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. The complainant was granted the liberty to seek relief from the Court of Competent Jurisdiction and file a petition under Section 14 of the Limitation Act for exclusion of the period during which the respondent sought remedy before other forums. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:36:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300151 The Supreme Court held that the complaint against the appellant under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not maintainable as the company was not arraigned as an accused. The Court acquitted the appellant, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. The complainant was granted the liberty to seek relief from the Court of Competent Jurisdiction and file a petition under Section 14 of the Limitation Act for exclusion of the period during which the respondent sought remedy before other forums. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300151