<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1216 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300154</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and the Trial Court. It held that there was no concluded contract due to the conditional acceptance, and thus, no breach or entitlement to damages. The Appellant was entitled to a refund of the earnest deposit with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1216 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300154</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and the Trial Court. It held that there was no concluded contract due to the conditional acceptance, and thus, no breach or entitlement to damages. The Appellant was entitled to a refund of the earnest deposit with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>