<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 496 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417031</link>
    <description>Under the Foreign Trade Policy, inter-unit transfer of raw materials between two 100% EOUs was not denied notification benefit merely because separate customs permission had not been obtained in the facts found, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld. Domestic sale of olives was treated as permissible because the CBEC circular on similar goods supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the policy. Repacking and labelling of imported goods was held to constitute manufacture under the Foreign Trade Policy, whose definition is broader than Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was sustained in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 496 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417031</link>
      <description>Under the Foreign Trade Policy, inter-unit transfer of raw materials between two 100% EOUs was not denied notification benefit merely because separate customs permission had not been obtained in the facts found, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld. Domestic sale of olives was treated as permissible because the CBEC circular on similar goods supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the policy. Repacking and labelling of imported goods was held to constitute manufacture under the Foreign Trade Policy, whose definition is broader than Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was sustained in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>