https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417007 The Court found that the respondent violated procedural fairness by passing the impugned order without allowing the petitioner sufficient opportunity to respond. The order was quashed due to the failure to follow the Circular's guidelines, and the matter was remitted back to the respondent for a speaking order within four weeks. The petitioner was granted a personal hearing in line with procedural fairness principles. The Writ Petition was disposed of with directions emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to established guidelines in administrative decisions. en-us Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:59:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417007 The Court found that the respondent violated procedural fairness by passing the impugned order without allowing the petitioner sufficient opportunity to respond. The order was quashed due to the failure to follow the Circular's guidelines, and the matter was remitted back to the respondent for a speaking order within four weeks. The petitioner was granted a personal hearing in line with procedural fairness principles. The Writ Petition was disposed of with directions emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to established guidelines in administrative decisions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417007