<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 471 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417006</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the interpretation of the term &quot;staple fiber&quot; in a customs notification. The decision was based on the respondent&#039;s liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, rendering the appeal not maintainable. The Court emphasized the Code&#039;s precedence over other laws, directing the appellant to seek redressal through the correct forum. All original documents were to be returned to the appellant&#039;s counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:59:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 471 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417006</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the interpretation of the term &quot;staple fiber&quot; in a customs notification. The decision was based on the respondent&#039;s liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, rendering the appeal not maintainable. The Court emphasized the Code&#039;s precedence over other laws, directing the appellant to seek redressal through the correct forum. All original documents were to be returned to the appellant&#039;s counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>