<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 464 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , JAIPUR BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the urgent convening of a general meeting for the Respondent Company to address a deadlock between two groups holding 50% equity shares, appointing an Independent Chairman to oversee the meeting. The Chairperson was tasked with regulating the meeting, appointing a Scrutinizer, and ensuring compliance with reporting requirements. Parties were instructed to settle disputes amicably and cooperate, with non-cooperation viewed seriously. The Chairperson had authority over meeting proceedings and compliance, emphasizing the importance of following directives until further orders were issued. Compliance with orders and future directions were emphasized, with the need for overall cooperation and adherence to the Tribunal&#039;s instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 464 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , JAIPUR BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the urgent convening of a general meeting for the Respondent Company to address a deadlock between two groups holding 50% equity shares, appointing an Independent Chairman to oversee the meeting. The Chairperson was tasked with regulating the meeting, appointing a Scrutinizer, and ensuring compliance with reporting requirements. Parties were instructed to settle disputes amicably and cooperate, with non-cooperation viewed seriously. The Chairperson had authority over meeting proceedings and compliance, emphasizing the importance of following directives until further orders were issued. Compliance with orders and future directions were emphasized, with the need for overall cooperation and adherence to the Tribunal&#039;s instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>