https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416986 The Court quashed the rejection orders, restored the applications, and directed the Respondent to conduct a fresh assessment after granting a personal hearing to the Petitioner. No coercive steps were to be taken against the Petitioner pending the outcome. The Court emphasized the importance of natural justice principles, ruling that the rejection without a hearing was erroneous. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the Petitioner, with no views expressed on the merits, leaving contentions open for further consideration. en-us Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416986 The Court quashed the rejection orders, restored the applications, and directed the Respondent to conduct a fresh assessment after granting a personal hearing to the Petitioner. No coercive steps were to be taken against the Petitioner pending the outcome. The Court emphasized the importance of natural justice principles, ruling that the rejection without a hearing was erroneous. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the Petitioner, with no views expressed on the merits, leaving contentions open for further consideration. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416986