<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 440 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416975</link>
    <description>The Court granted interim relief to the petitioner by restraining the respondents from recovering differential duty, interest, and penalty as per the show-cause notice, citing lack of jurisdiction. The respondents were directed to file a reply affidavit within six weeks. The Court allowed for a rejoinder within two weeks and granted liberty to apply for early disposal of the writ petition based on the pending review application before the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:58:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 440 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416975</link>
      <description>The Court granted interim relief to the petitioner by restraining the respondents from recovering differential duty, interest, and penalty as per the show-cause notice, citing lack of jurisdiction. The respondents were directed to file a reply affidavit within six weeks. The Court allowed for a rejoinder within two weeks and granted liberty to apply for early disposal of the writ petition based on the pending review application before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>