https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300107 An interlocutory order is not outside the scope of a judgment merely because it is not final. The controlling test is whether the order decides matters of moment, affects vital and valuable rights of the parties, or causes serious injustice. Applying that principle, refusal to allow amendment of the written statement at the stage of framing issues was held to have a direct bearing on the parties' rights and to be amenable to appellate scrutiny. The appeal was therefore maintainable, the High Court should have examined it on merits, and the matter was remitted for appellate consideration according to law. en-us Thu, 06 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:55:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300107 An interlocutory order is not outside the scope of a judgment merely because it is not final. The controlling test is whether the order decides matters of moment, affects vital and valuable rights of the parties, or causes serious injustice. Applying that principle, refusal to allow amendment of the written statement at the stage of framing issues was held to have a direct bearing on the parties' rights and to be amenable to appellate scrutiny. The appeal was therefore maintainable, the High Court should have examined it on merits, and the matter was remitted for appellate consideration according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300107