https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300105 Under the lease-and-development scheme, the authority's duty to provide basic amenities was a statutory obligation, but it did not make prior provision of all amenities a condition precedent to the allottee's liability to pay premium, interest, ground rent or instalments. Non-provision of full development could not be used as a complete defence to those dues. At the same time, where essential facilities such as roads, drainage, sewerage, drinking water or street lighting were lacking, case-specific relief could be examined only for penalty and penal interest, with instalment liability remaining unaffected. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:34:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300105 Under the lease-and-development scheme, the authority's duty to provide basic amenities was a statutory obligation, but it did not make prior provision of all amenities a condition precedent to the allottee's liability to pay premium, interest, ground rent or instalments. Non-provision of full development could not be used as a complete defence to those dues. At the same time, where essential facilities such as roads, drainage, sewerage, drinking water or street lighting were lacking, case-specific relief could be examined only for penalty and penal interest, with instalment liability remaining unaffected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300105