https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416974 The Court quashed the orders confirming the seizure of goods under the UPGST Act, 2017, criticizing the authorities for unjustly seizing the goods despite the petitioner meeting the Act's requirements. Emphasizing fair treatment and adherence to statutory provisions, the judgment demanded security for the release of goods, allowed the writ petition with costs payable to the petitioner, and directed the recovery of costs from the responsible officer. It highlighted the importance of a conducive business environment for the state's development and instructed the refund of any deposited amounts as per the impugned order. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416974 The Court quashed the orders confirming the seizure of goods under the UPGST Act, 2017, criticizing the authorities for unjustly seizing the goods despite the petitioner meeting the Act's requirements. Emphasizing fair treatment and adherence to statutory provisions, the judgment demanded security for the release of goods, allowed the writ petition with costs payable to the petitioner, and directed the recovery of costs from the responsible officer. It highlighted the importance of a conducive business environment for the state's development and instructed the refund of any deposited amounts as per the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416974