<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 436 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416971</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s objections, ruling that there was no reasonable belief for the Assessing Officer to conclude that income had escaped assessment. The petition was allowed, quashing the notice to reopen the assessment for the year 2003-2004 and related consequential notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 436 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416971</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s objections, ruling that there was no reasonable belief for the Assessing Officer to conclude that income had escaped assessment. The petition was allowed, quashing the notice to reopen the assessment for the year 2003-2004 and related consequential notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>