https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416940 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking release of detained goods and refund of charges, emphasizing that contractual disputes involving Customs Service Providers should be adjudicated by the competent forum, not through writ proceedings. Despite the release of goods and compliance with original relief, further action against specific respondents was deemed unnecessary. The court clarified that writ proceedings under Article 226 cannot resolve disputed facts solely based on affidavits and granted liberty to pursue remedies through the appropriate legal channels if needed. en-us Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:38:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416940 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking release of detained goods and refund of charges, emphasizing that contractual disputes involving Customs Service Providers should be adjudicated by the competent forum, not through writ proceedings. Despite the release of goods and compliance with original relief, further action against specific respondents was deemed unnecessary. The court clarified that writ proceedings under Article 226 cannot resolve disputed facts solely based on affidavits and granted liberty to pursue remedies through the appropriate legal channels if needed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416940