<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1605 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300079</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the recovery of CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The dispute centered on the eligibility for credit against documentation not compliant with the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to the credit, setting aside the order-in-original that denied eligibility and imposed penalties. The judgment emphasized that technical lapses should not hinder the legitimate application of the CENVAT credit scheme, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the recovery demand and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1605 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300079</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the recovery of CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The dispute centered on the eligibility for credit against documentation not compliant with the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to the credit, setting aside the order-in-original that denied eligibility and imposed penalties. The judgment emphasized that technical lapses should not hinder the legitimate application of the CENVAT credit scheme, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the recovery demand and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>