https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300076 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal in part for statistical purposes, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to apply the same margin to non-US transactions as accepted in Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) proceedings for US transactions. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verification and adherence to judicial precedents in resolving the various tax issues raised in the case. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:35:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300076 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal in part for statistical purposes, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to apply the same margin to non-US transactions as accepted in Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) proceedings for US transactions. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verification and adherence to judicial precedents in resolving the various tax issues raised in the case. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300076