<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1907 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300075</link>
    <description>An appeal under Central Excise was treated as not maintainable because the tax effect fell below the prescribed monetary limit under the applicable CBEC circular. On that basis, the Revenue sought withdrawal, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The operative point is that the low tax effect threshold controlled maintainability, so the matter was not pursued on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1907 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300075</link>
      <description>An appeal under Central Excise was treated as not maintainable because the tax effect fell below the prescribed monetary limit under the applicable CBEC circular. On that basis, the Revenue sought withdrawal, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The operative point is that the low tax effect threshold controlled maintainability, so the matter was not pursued on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>