<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1788 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300092</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the appellant&#039;s conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties reached a settlement agreement during the appeal process, leading to acquittal. The appellant made payments as per the settlement terms, and both parties agreed to withdraw all cases against each other. The Court considered the settlement and mutual agreement, ending the legal dispute between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1788 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300092</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the appellant&#039;s conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties reached a settlement agreement during the appeal process, leading to acquittal. The appellant made payments as per the settlement terms, and both parties agreed to withdraw all cases against each other. The Court considered the settlement and mutual agreement, ending the legal dispute between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>