<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1931 (10) TMI 19 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300072</link>
    <description>Sufficient cause was accepted to set aside abatement and condone the delay in bringing the legal representative on record because the appellant, a pardanashin lady, had lost contact with Lyallpur and had no reliable knowledge of the death until informed through counsel. The suit nonetheless failed on the merits because the plaintiff did not prove the definite terms of the alleged oral contract: the design, make, size, price, and other essential particulars of the shirts were not established with the certainty required by law. The appeal succeeded, the lower appellate decree was set aside, and the suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1931 (10) TMI 19 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300072</link>
      <description>Sufficient cause was accepted to set aside abatement and condone the delay in bringing the legal representative on record because the appellant, a pardanashin lady, had lost contact with Lyallpur and had no reliable knowledge of the death until informed through counsel. The suit nonetheless failed on the merits because the plaintiff did not prove the definite terms of the alleged oral contract: the design, make, size, price, and other essential particulars of the shirts were not established with the certainty required by law. The appeal succeeded, the lower appellate decree was set aside, and the suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>