https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300069 Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, an absconding accused may seek release of attached property only within the statutory time and only on satisfying the conditions that he did not abscond to avoid execution of the warrant and had no notice of the proclamation sufficient to enable attendance. The Kerala HC held that once two years from the date of attachment had expired, the accused's statutory right to move for release was lost. The claim and objection remedy remained available to third parties, but any independent civil remedy was outside the scope of the revision. The application for release was therefore not maintainable. en-us Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:48:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300069 Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, an absconding accused may seek release of attached property only within the statutory time and only on satisfying the conditions that he did not abscond to avoid execution of the warrant and had no notice of the proclamation sufficient to enable attendance. The Kerala HC held that once two years from the date of attachment had expired, the accused's statutory right to move for release was lost. The claim and objection remedy remained available to third parties, but any independent civil remedy was outside the scope of the revision. The application for release was therefore not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300069