<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Quashes Confiscation of Goods Sold Below MRP; Undervaluation Not Grounds for Seizure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61381</link>
    <description>Validity of confiscation and detention of goods - detention on the ground that manufacturer sells his products to its customer or dealer at a price lower than the MRP - intent to evade tax or not - it is a settled legal position that undervaluation cannot be a ground for seizure of goods in transit by the inspecting authority. - The confiscation proceedings initiated by the respondents are hereby quashed and set aside - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:13:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Quashes Confiscation of Goods Sold Below MRP; Undervaluation Not Grounds for Seizure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61381</link>
      <description>Validity of confiscation and detention of goods - detention on the ground that manufacturer sells his products to its customer or dealer at a price lower than the MRP - intent to evade tax or not - it is a settled legal position that undervaluation cannot be a ground for seizure of goods in transit by the inspecting authority. - The confiscation proceedings initiated by the respondents are hereby quashed and set aside - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:13:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>