https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300066 Execution of a registered sale deed may be proved by admissions, surrounding circumstances and other reliable evidence even without examining the scribe or attesting witnesses; Section 67 of the Evidence Act does not require one exclusive mode of proof, and the deed was therefore held proved. The plea of adverse possession failed because the record did not establish continuous hostile possession for the requisite period. In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact could not be disturbed absent perversity, illegality or findings based on no evidence, so the decree in favour of the plaintiffs was maintained. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:17:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300066 Execution of a registered sale deed may be proved by admissions, surrounding circumstances and other reliable evidence even without examining the scribe or attesting witnesses; Section 67 of the Evidence Act does not require one exclusive mode of proof, and the deed was therefore held proved. The plea of adverse possession failed because the record did not establish continuous hostile possession for the requisite period. In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact could not be disturbed absent perversity, illegality or findings based on no evidence, so the decree in favour of the plaintiffs was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300066