https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300064 The Supreme Court dismissed the landlord's appeal in a suit for eviction against a tenant firm, alleging sub-letting of premises. The High Court overturned the trial court's eviction decree, finding no sub-letting as one partner retained legal possession after the firm's dissolution. The Supreme Court held that transfer of tenancy rights to a partner without landlord's consent did not constitute sub-letting, emphasizing that in a partnership, the tenant retains legal possession. As one partner continued in possession, the Court upheld the High Court's decision, dismissing the eviction suit. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:31:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300064 The Supreme Court dismissed the landlord's appeal in a suit for eviction against a tenant firm, alleging sub-letting of premises. The High Court overturned the trial court's eviction decree, finding no sub-letting as one partner retained legal possession after the firm's dissolution. The Supreme Court held that transfer of tenancy rights to a partner without landlord's consent did not constitute sub-letting, emphasizing that in a partnership, the tenant retains legal possession. As one partner continued in possession, the Court upheld the High Court's decision, dismissing the eviction suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300064