<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 378 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416913</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the re-opening of the assessment, based on the same material without any new disclosure by the petitioner, was impermissible as there was no failure on the petitioner&#039;s part to disclose material facts necessary for assessment. The Court quashed the notice for re-opening the assessment and subsequent order, emphasizing the importance of establishing such failure for valid re-opening under Sections 147 and 148 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 378 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416913</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the re-opening of the assessment, based on the same material without any new disclosure by the petitioner, was impermissible as there was no failure on the petitioner&#039;s part to disclose material facts necessary for assessment. The Court quashed the notice for re-opening the assessment and subsequent order, emphasizing the importance of establishing such failure for valid re-opening under Sections 147 and 148 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>