<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 368 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals by the Revenue for AYs 2011-12, 2013-14, and 2014-15, upholding that the license fee paid for telecommunication spectrum and its annual extension should be treated as revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents and the case facts, emphasizing that the fees facilitated trading operations without creating a capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:35:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 368 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals by the Revenue for AYs 2011-12, 2013-14, and 2014-15, upholding that the license fee paid for telecommunication spectrum and its annual extension should be treated as revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents and the case facts, emphasizing that the fees facilitated trading operations without creating a capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>