<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 364 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the respondents to permit the appellant to amend the shipping bills to claim rewards under the Merchandise Exports Incentive Scheme (MEIS). The Tribunal emphasized that the procedural error of marking &#039;NO&#039; instead of &#039;YES&#039; should not deprive the appellant of substantive benefits, ensuring that the appellant&#039;s rights under MEIS were upheld despite the error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 364 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the respondents to permit the appellant to amend the shipping bills to claim rewards under the Merchandise Exports Incentive Scheme (MEIS). The Tribunal emphasized that the procedural error of marking &#039;NO&#039; instead of &#039;YES&#039; should not deprive the appellant of substantive benefits, ensuring that the appellant&#039;s rights under MEIS were upheld despite the error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>