<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 359 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416894</link>
    <description>Industrial gases manufactured at Unit No. I were held to fall within the specific positive entry for industrial gases, so the general exclusion for inorganic chemicals did not defeat exemption under Notification No. 49/2003-CE. Dissolved acetylene gas manufactured at Unit No. II was held not to satisfy the cumulative conditions of the negative list under Notification No. 50/2003-CE, because it did not match the stipulated NIC sub-class. The result was that both units remained eligible for exemption, and the duty demand and consequential penalties did not survive. The governing principle applied was that a specific beneficial entry prevails over a general exclusion, and a negative-list exclusion operates only when all stated conditions are met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 359 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416894</link>
      <description>Industrial gases manufactured at Unit No. I were held to fall within the specific positive entry for industrial gases, so the general exclusion for inorganic chemicals did not defeat exemption under Notification No. 49/2003-CE. Dissolved acetylene gas manufactured at Unit No. II was held not to satisfy the cumulative conditions of the negative list under Notification No. 50/2003-CE, because it did not match the stipulated NIC sub-class. The result was that both units remained eligible for exemption, and the duty demand and consequential penalties did not survive. The governing principle applied was that a specific beneficial entry prevails over a general exclusion, and a negative-list exclusion operates only when all stated conditions are met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>