<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1212 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300052</link>
    <description>Under the SAD refund notification, refund cannot be denied merely because the sales invoice description differs from the Bills of Entry if the importer shows that the discrepancy is clerical and the goods are otherwise the same. Here, the sales invoice and Bills of Entry related to the same product, and the importer supported the claim with a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, reconciliation statement and evidence of VAT payment. On that material, the notification requirements were treated as satisfied, and the mismatch was found to have no legal or factual basis for rejection. The refund claim for the disputed Bills of Entry was therefore allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1212 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300052</link>
      <description>Under the SAD refund notification, refund cannot be denied merely because the sales invoice description differs from the Bills of Entry if the importer shows that the discrepancy is clerical and the goods are otherwise the same. Here, the sales invoice and Bills of Entry related to the same product, and the importer supported the claim with a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, reconciliation statement and evidence of VAT payment. On that material, the notification requirements were treated as satisfied, and the mismatch was found to have no legal or factual basis for rejection. The refund claim for the disputed Bills of Entry was therefore allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>