https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300044 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting limited errors and cannot be used to reopen questions not framed or considered in the second appeal. A party may not introduce a fresh issue for the first time in review, and a challenge directed at the merits of the earlier benami ownership ruling, including the effect of the Benami legislation, is a matter for appeal rather than review. The court therefore declined to re-examine the substantive benami controversy and held the review petition not maintainable for re-agitation of merits, with each party left to bear its own costs. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:50:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300044 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting limited errors and cannot be used to reopen questions not framed or considered in the second appeal. A party may not introduce a fresh issue for the first time in review, and a challenge directed at the merits of the earlier benami ownership ruling, including the effect of the Benami legislation, is a matter for appeal rather than review. The court therefore declined to re-examine the substantive benami controversy and held the review petition not maintainable for re-agitation of merits, with each party left to bear its own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300044