https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300045 The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench erred in overturning the Single Judge's decision, which considered crucial evidence of a prior agreement dated 31.12.1970. The Court found the application before the Sub-Registrar unreliable. Consequently, the Single Judge's judgment was restored, dismissing the claim for specific performance and recognizing the defendants as bona fide purchasers. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Division Bench's order. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:50:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300045 The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench erred in overturning the Single Judge's decision, which considered crucial evidence of a prior agreement dated 31.12.1970. The Court found the application before the Sub-Registrar unreliable. Consequently, the Single Judge's judgment was restored, dismissing the claim for specific performance and recognizing the defendants as bona fide purchasers. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Division Bench's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300045