https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300043 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment and accepting the appellant's writ petition. The seniority list of June 14, 1974, was quashed, and the validity of the 1963 and 1967 seniority lists was upheld. The promotion panel of January 13, 1975, was invalidated, leading to the directive for a new promotion panel based on the 1963 and 1967 seniority lists. The court emphasized the importance of continuous officiation in determining seniority and rejected the retrospective application of new seniority principles introduced in 1974. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:57:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300043 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment and accepting the appellant's writ petition. The seniority list of June 14, 1974, was quashed, and the validity of the 1963 and 1967 seniority lists was upheld. The promotion panel of January 13, 1975, was invalidated, leading to the directive for a new promotion panel based on the 1963 and 1967 seniority lists. The court emphasized the importance of continuous officiation in determining seniority and rejected the retrospective application of new seniority principles introduced in 1974. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300043