https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300042 The court held that the determination of seniority for officiating clerks Grade I promoted from Grade II was based on seniority-cum-suitability, treating all qualified candidates equally. The classification of direct recruits and promotees for promotion purposes was found to be based on intelligible differentia related to efficiency, not violating constitutional rights. The court concluded that the provisions of the Indian Railways Establishment Manual regarding promotion and seniority were reasonable and dismissed the petitioners' claims of discrimination or constitutional violations under Articles 14 and 16. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:44:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300042 The court held that the determination of seniority for officiating clerks Grade I promoted from Grade II was based on seniority-cum-suitability, treating all qualified candidates equally. The classification of direct recruits and promotees for promotion purposes was found to be based on intelligible differentia related to efficiency, not violating constitutional rights. The court concluded that the provisions of the Indian Railways Establishment Manual regarding promotion and seniority were reasonable and dismissed the petitioners' claims of discrimination or constitutional violations under Articles 14 and 16. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300042