https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416890 The Division Bench directed the de-freezing of the petitioner's bank account under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which had been frozen beyond the permissible period. Subsequently, the respondents re-froze and provisionally attached the account, alleging lack of cooperation from the petitioner. The petitioner claimed mala fide intentions by the respondents. After discussions, the petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to seek alternative remedies. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to explore other avenues for relief. en-us Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416890 The Division Bench directed the de-freezing of the petitioner's bank account under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which had been frozen beyond the permissible period. Subsequently, the respondents re-froze and provisionally attached the account, alleging lack of cooperation from the petitioner. The petitioner claimed mala fide intentions by the respondents. After discussions, the petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to seek alternative remedies. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to explore other avenues for relief. Case-Laws GST Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416890