<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 320 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416855</link>
    <description>In a PMLA bail context, the discussion notes that where the alleged predicate offences were under the Official Secrets Act and allied IPC provisions, and the projected proceeds of crime were below one crore rupees, the ordinary bail principles applied. It states that the twin conditions under section 45 were not revived by the later amendment, so bail had to be assessed on the triple test of flight risk, tampering with evidence, and influencing witnesses. On the stated facts, the accused&#039;s local roots, repeated cooperation with investigation, and absence of material showing interference with the case were treated as supporting grant of bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 09:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 320 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416855</link>
      <description>In a PMLA bail context, the discussion notes that where the alleged predicate offences were under the Official Secrets Act and allied IPC provisions, and the projected proceeds of crime were below one crore rupees, the ordinary bail principles applied. It states that the twin conditions under section 45 were not revived by the later amendment, so bail had to be assessed on the triple test of flight risk, tampering with evidence, and influencing witnesses. On the stated facts, the accused&#039;s local roots, repeated cooperation with investigation, and absence of material showing interference with the case were treated as supporting grant of bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>