<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 316 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that payments made by the head office to overseas branches were not subject to service tax as they were for recurring expenses, not specific services. The demand for service tax on these payments was set aside. The issue of additional demands and interest was remanded for verification, with no penalties imposed for payments made pre-Show Cause Notice. The appeal was partly allowed through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 316 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that payments made by the head office to overseas branches were not subject to service tax as they were for recurring expenses, not specific services. The demand for service tax on these payments was set aside. The issue of additional demands and interest was remanded for verification, with no penalties imposed for payments made pre-Show Cause Notice. The appeal was partly allowed through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>