<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1297 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the application for liquidation under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, concerning M/s. Mrgra Industries Limited. Despite efforts during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), including repeated Expression of Interest issuances, the non-compliant Resolution Plan led to the Committee of Creditors deciding on liquidation. The CoC fixed the Liquidator&#039;s fee, appointed valuers for asset valuation, and estimated liquidation value. The order included specific directions for the liquidation process, appointing a Liquidator, initiating a fresh Moratorium, investigating financial affairs, disposing of pending applications, and submitting reports within set timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1297 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the application for liquidation under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, concerning M/s. Mrgra Industries Limited. Despite efforts during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), including repeated Expression of Interest issuances, the non-compliant Resolution Plan led to the Committee of Creditors deciding on liquidation. The CoC fixed the Liquidator&#039;s fee, appointed valuers for asset valuation, and estimated liquidation value. The order included specific directions for the liquidation process, appointing a Liquidator, initiating a fresh Moratorium, investigating financial affairs, disposing of pending applications, and submitting reports within set timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>