<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1630 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300034</link>
    <description>The court declined to grant the Writs of mandamus sought by the petitioner to direct the Central Board of Direct Taxes and the Income Tax Department to take action on complaints against certain companies. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims of harassment and grievances against the companies, the court noted that an investigation was already underway initiated by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not disguise a private cause as a public one when seeking mandamus relief. As the official respondents had already taken cognizance and initiated action based on the investigation, the court found no further orders necessary in the writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1630 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300034</link>
      <description>The court declined to grant the Writs of mandamus sought by the petitioner to direct the Central Board of Direct Taxes and the Income Tax Department to take action on complaints against certain companies. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims of harassment and grievances against the companies, the court noted that an investigation was already underway initiated by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not disguise a private cause as a public one when seeking mandamus relief. As the official respondents had already taken cognizance and initiated action based on the investigation, the court found no further orders necessary in the writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>