https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300032 Dominance under the Competition Act must be assessed using the statutory factors in Section 19 and market reality, not market share alone. On the facts, the rapidly expanding Bengaluru radio taxi market, the presence of competitors including Uber, and the platform's pricing and incentives did not show durable market power or sustained predatory pricing; no abuse of dominant position under Section 4 was established. The driver arrangements were voluntary and dynamic, with drivers free to move between platforms, and the incentive structure did not amount to an exclusive or coercive anti-competitive agreement. The impugned order therefore required no interference and both appeals were dismissed. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:59:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300032 Dominance under the Competition Act must be assessed using the statutory factors in Section 19 and market reality, not market share alone. On the facts, the rapidly expanding Bengaluru radio taxi market, the presence of competitors including Uber, and the platform's pricing and incentives did not show durable market power or sustained predatory pricing; no abuse of dominant position under Section 4 was established. The driver arrangements were voluntary and dynamic, with drivers free to move between platforms, and the incentive structure did not amount to an exclusive or coercive anti-competitive agreement. The impugned order therefore required no interference and both appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300032