<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 296 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416831</link>
    <description>Compensatory payments made to remove business iments were treated as revenue expenditure rather than disallowable outgoings. Railway charges paid for wagon overloading were held allowable under section 37(1) because they were compensatory in nature and the assessee could not weigh at the originating station due to the absence of a weighing bridge. Net present value paid to the forest department for use of forest land for mining was also treated as revenue expenditure, as it merely facilitated an existing mining right without creating any fresh right or enduring asset. The additions and disallowances in dispute were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 296 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416831</link>
      <description>Compensatory payments made to remove business iments were treated as revenue expenditure rather than disallowable outgoings. Railway charges paid for wagon overloading were held allowable under section 37(1) because they were compensatory in nature and the assessee could not weigh at the originating station due to the absence of a weighing bridge. Net present value paid to the forest department for use of forest land for mining was also treated as revenue expenditure, as it merely facilitated an existing mining right without creating any fresh right or enduring asset. The additions and disallowances in dispute were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>