<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 285 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) invalid as it failed to specify the grounds for the penalty. Relying on precedents, including a High Court decision, the penalty of Rs. 3,30,000/- was deleted. The Tribunal did not address other grounds as the penalty was already deleted due to procedural defects. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:49:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 285 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) invalid as it failed to specify the grounds for the penalty. Relying on precedents, including a High Court decision, the penalty of Rs. 3,30,000/- was deleted. The Tribunal did not address other grounds as the penalty was already deleted due to procedural defects. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>