<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 257 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416792</link>
    <description>Demand of duty and penalty for alleged clandestine removal cannot be sustained on third-party diary entries and an accompanying statement alone. The record must also contain independent corroborative evidence showing clandestine manufacture, removal of goods, and identification of buyers or recipients. Where the assessee&#039;s statement does not amount to an admission and there is no evidence of movement of goods or enquiry from alleged buyers, third-party material remains insufficient. On that basis, the duty demand and consequential penalty on the director were held unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:48:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 257 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416792</link>
      <description>Demand of duty and penalty for alleged clandestine removal cannot be sustained on third-party diary entries and an accompanying statement alone. The record must also contain independent corroborative evidence showing clandestine manufacture, removal of goods, and identification of buyers or recipients. Where the assessee&#039;s statement does not amount to an admission and there is no evidence of movement of goods or enquiry from alleged buyers, third-party material remains insufficient. On that basis, the duty demand and consequential penalty on the director were held unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>