https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416787 The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions. The plaintiff could not establish the authenticity of the promissory note and was denied the claimed amount. However, the defendant was ordered to repay the acknowledged advance of Rs. 1,90,000/- with 3% interest per annum, as confirmed by the courts. en-us Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jan 2022 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416787 The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions. The plaintiff could not establish the authenticity of the promissory note and was denied the claimed amount. However, the defendant was ordered to repay the acknowledged advance of Rs. 1,90,000/- with 3% interest per annum, as confirmed by the courts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416787