<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1429 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300004</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, expunging adverse remarks made by the Second Additional Sessions Judge in the judgment and quashing the show-cause notice issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Police) based on those remarks. The court held that the remarks were unnecessary and unjustified, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the notice and any proceedings against the petitioner were invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1429 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300004</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, expunging adverse remarks made by the Second Additional Sessions Judge in the judgment and quashing the show-cause notice issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Police) based on those remarks. The court held that the remarks were unnecessary and unjustified, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the notice and any proceedings against the petitioner were invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>