https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299996 The Tribunal held that no review power was conferred under the Companies Act, the Companies Rules, or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so the aggrieved party should have pursued an appeal instead of review. It further treated the earlier direction for handing over custody of the vehicle as continuing because there was no stay or compliance, and invoked Section 429 of the Companies Act, 2013 to enable enforcement. The Liquidator was authorised to seek police assistance from the Commissioner of Police having jurisdiction to trace and take custody of the vehicle, and the review application was dismissed as misconceived. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:46:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299996 The Tribunal held that no review power was conferred under the Companies Act, the Companies Rules, or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so the aggrieved party should have pursued an appeal instead of review. It further treated the earlier direction for handing over custody of the vehicle as continuing because there was no stay or compliance, and invoked Section 429 of the Companies Act, 2013 to enable enforcement. The Liquidator was authorised to seek police assistance from the Commissioner of Police having jurisdiction to trace and take custody of the vehicle, and the review application was dismissed as misconceived. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299996