<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1601 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300012</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the stay of collection of the disputed tax pending the appeal before the Telangana Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court emphasized the importance of providing reasons for rejecting stay applications to alleviate the Court&#039;s workload. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was instructed to ensure that Additional Commissioners provide reasons when deciding on stay applications. Since the petitioner had paid 25% of the disputed tax, collecting the entire amount would make the appeal meaningless. No costs were awarded, and pending applications were closed. The registry was to inform the Commissioner of the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1601 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300012</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the stay of collection of the disputed tax pending the appeal before the Telangana Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court emphasized the importance of providing reasons for rejecting stay applications to alleviate the Court&#039;s workload. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was instructed to ensure that Additional Commissioners provide reasons when deciding on stay applications. Since the petitioner had paid 25% of the disputed tax, collecting the entire amount would make the appeal meaningless. No costs were awarded, and pending applications were closed. The registry was to inform the Commissioner of the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>