<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1624 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300011</link>
    <description>A writ petition concerning DRT-related recovery proceedings was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated that, because of subsequent events, nothing survived for adjudication. The court did not examine the merits and disposed of the matter on the basis that no live controversy remained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1624 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300011</link>
      <description>A writ petition concerning DRT-related recovery proceedings was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated that, because of subsequent events, nothing survived for adjudication. The court did not examine the merits and disposed of the matter on the basis that no live controversy remained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>