<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 1003 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299991</link>
    <description>Preventive detention is sustainable only where the alleged acts affect public order by causing a wider community impact and disturbing the even tempo of life in the locality. Offences confined to specific individuals, even if serious, remain matters of law and order unless their reach and potentiality extend to the public at large. On the facts, the land-grabbing and cheating allegations did not cross that threshold, so the detention order was unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 17:06:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 1003 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299991</link>
      <description>Preventive detention is sustainable only where the alleged acts affect public order by causing a wider community impact and disturbing the even tempo of life in the locality. Offences confined to specific individuals, even if serious, remain matters of law and order unless their reach and potentiality extend to the public at large. On the facts, the land-grabbing and cheating allegations did not cross that threshold, so the detention order was unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>