https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299983 Arson and planting a bomb in an educational institution were treated as conduct prejudicial to public order because such acts, by their nature and potential impact, could disrupt the even tempo of community life and affect the school, its staff, students, and records. The delay of 34 days in considering the detenu's representation was assessed on the facts and was not found to be constitutionally fatal, since there is no rigid abstract time-limit and the representation had been processed in connection with the Advisory Board and the local inquiry. The detention was upheld on both grounds. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jan 2022 16:14:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299983 Arson and planting a bomb in an educational institution were treated as conduct prejudicial to public order because such acts, by their nature and potential impact, could disrupt the even tempo of community life and affect the school, its staff, students, and records. The delay of 34 days in considering the detenu's representation was assessed on the facts and was not found to be constitutionally fatal, since there is no rigid abstract time-limit and the representation had been processed in connection with the Advisory Board and the local inquiry. The detention was upheld on both grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299983