https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299981 Preventive detention was treated as justified where repeated conduct disturbed public tranquility and crossed from law and order into public order. Statutory approval of the detention order was found timely because the authority approved it within the prescribed period, and later communication did not affect validity. A representation made after approval and Advisory Board reference was not treated as the relevant statutory representation, though it was considered on merits. Objections based on non-supply of documents and delay from the last prejudicial act failed because only relied-upon material had to be supplied and no break in the live link was established. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jan 2022 15:59:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299981 Preventive detention was treated as justified where repeated conduct disturbed public tranquility and crossed from law and order into public order. Statutory approval of the detention order was found timely because the authority approved it within the prescribed period, and later communication did not affect validity. A representation made after approval and Advisory Board reference was not treated as the relevant statutory representation, though it was considered on merits. Objections based on non-supply of documents and delay from the last prejudicial act failed because only relied-upon material had to be supplied and no break in the live link was established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299981